| Author | Comment | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
jmbeck
|
Mississippi is now the last state with a bullshit archaic 6% ABV beer law. |
Lead | |||||
|
Gov. Riley signed the Alabama bill today.
Last Edited By: jmbeck 05/22/09 08:52 AM.
Edited 1 time.
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
thelaw |
I bet their DUI rate is going to skyrocket.** | #1 | |||||
|
nt.
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
Big D |
#2 | ||||||
|
If you drink beer for the alcohol then maybe you should chase it with bourbon. If you drink beer for the
taste then why does it matter NOW if you think the more alcohol content makes the taste then you have a legitimate bitch?
And then again I may not have a clue what I am talking about.
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
Sarc Dawg |
Only took us 5 years.... | #3 | |||||
|
and they had to pass it while a prohibitionist Senator who threatened to filibuster was taking a leak... |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
dawgstudent |
There are a lot better beers.... | #4 | |||||
|
that have greater than a 6% alcohol.
I support the two most frustrating teams in America: The New Orleans Saints and the Mississippi State Bulldogs.
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
thelaw |
Big D | #5 | |||||
|
Sarcasm- if you'll scroll down to the Mike Allen thread I basically regurgitated his argument. It was supposed to be a joke.
I'm all for raising the 6% to the 13% level, hopefully it will happen soon. And I'm an asshole for other reasons regardless. |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
Roy Munson |
Because it limits the VARIETY... | #6 | |||||
|
many "foreign" and even domestic beers have a higher alcohol content than the MS limit. No limit would allow you to buy any and all of the worlds
"finest" beers and have an umlimited choice. Folks that drink this type of beer aint buying a case of it to take to a crawfish boil and get
shitfaced. They/We will still do that with the typical millers, buds, keystones, coors, beasts, nattys etc...
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
Optimus Prime 4 |
because many of the beers that TASTE great have more than 6% ABV | #7 | |||||
|
therefore it limits your choice of beer by taste, which is how you think we should decide what to drink. It's the great tasting microbrews that this keeps
out. This has nothing to do with simply getting more alcohol, as these are typically more expensive anyway, so you get less alcohol per dollar.
Plus, is there any reason not to allow more?
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
RebelBruiser |
#8 | ||||||
Roy Munson wrote: Exactly, if you're drinking to get wasted, you're more than likely going to drink cheap beer with lower alcohol content. If you're drinking the higher alcohol beers, it's probably because you actually enjoy a beer for being a beer, which means you usually aren't doing it to get canned. For me personally, when I want to drink slowly and enjoy a beer with dinner or just enjoy a beer or two with friends, I typically get a dark European beer, typically with a higher alcohol content. If I'm out looking to get canned, I get the cheaper beer with the lower alcohol content and pound them. I'm sure a lot of people are that way.
Last Edited By: RebelBruiser 05/22/09 09:10 AM.
Edited 1 time.
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
muntego |
#9 | ||||||
dawgstudent wrote:New Belgium Brewers( Fat Tire,Blue Paddle, Irish Red), Dogfish Head Ale, etc.. |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
coursesuper |
Of the top 100 beers world wide MS can get 6, | #10 | |||||
|
taste and how they are crafted make a big differnce due to ABV. Of the beers that I like most are about 9%, All the trappist ales from Belgium, and the west
coast stuff 8% to 11% ABV and it makes a huge taste difference.
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
thelaw |
Plus we're holding back this baby: | #11 | |||||
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
8Dog |
Damn, Im a redneck* | #12 | |||||
|
d
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
Sarc Dawg |
Fat Tire is under 6% | #13 | |||||
|
but many Breweries won't expand into an area if they cannot do it with their full line.
And as people have said- people don't drink these to get wasted- that's what beers with "drinkability" (probably to WORST marketing campaign ever) are for. Nobody's going to be funneling a $9 bottle of Chimay. |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
jmbeck |
We still won't be able to get Dogfish Head | #14 | |||||
|
Because of Alabama's 16 oz. container restriction.
Hopefully we'll tackle that next. But, today's victory opened the door to a lot of beers. Big D, as everyone else has stated, this wasn't an attempt to get Bud Light in a higher ABV. It now allows us to enjoy beers that have greater and different flavors. The average drunk and teenager/college student will not be affected by this bill. |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
UpTheMiddlex3Punt |
Upping the ABV also brings in more beers below 6% | #15 | |||||
|
Several breweries have a lineup that goes from <4% to as much as 12% (very few beers are above the new upper limit). Problem is that most do not want to
sell only a small part of their lineup.
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
coursesuper |
No Stone, New Belgium, North Coast, Three Floyds, etc... | #16 | |||||
|
I would kill for easy access to Pliny the Elder and any Stone Products.
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
UpTheMiddlex3Punt |
Dogfish head has a lot of beers in 330mL bottles | #17 | |||||
|
Actually, I've only ever had their beer out of small bottles.
I'm more concerned about beers from Stone. Arrogant Bastard only comes in a bomber, I think. Correct me if I'm wrong. |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
dawgstudent |
And the Coop De Grace as they say in France... | #18 | |||||
|
Bulldog Strong Ale - 6.3%
Neither this message board nor its rules and regulations are associated with Scottish & Newcastle PLC d/b/a Bulldog Strong Ale.
I support the two most frustrating teams in America: The New Orleans Saints and the Mississippi State Bulldogs.
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
thelaw |
Why is it that we can't get Yuengling down here? | #19 | |||||
|
The "line up" reason?
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
coursesuper |
Arrogant Bastard is only in 22oz bottles, as are most of their product.. | #20 | |||||
|
but I have had Dogfish head 60, 90 and 120min, in 16 oz bottles.
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||





